Paramount just released the new trailer to the Sonic The Hedgehog movie and if fan reaction is any measure, the new version of the iconic video game
Paramount just released the new trailer to the Sonic The Hedgehog movie and if fan reaction is any measure, the new version of the iconic video game character is far better than the last. You might remember that the previous trailer was wildly panned due mostly to the fact that the lead character looked decidedly not like the video game version. And that was a huge problem for the film’s intended audience.
In fact, it was so bad that director Jeff Fowler announced on twitter that they were going to actually delay the film and go back to the drawing board, so to speak. At the time I wrote how I thought that was the perfect response. When you’re creating a film based on a character that familiar, you have to get it right, or else you end up with an epic failure.
In fact, in some ways, that’s exactly what the original version of Sonic was–a failure. Mostly it was a failure to understand that when you mess with a fixture of people’s childhood, you’ve lost your audience. The reason people would pay money to see a movie about a video game is because of the connection that character has to positive memories they might have. Mess with that and you’ve failed.
The updated version, however, is gaining plenty of props from fans online. Mostly because people are giving Fowler and the studio credit for taking the time necessary to actually get it right instead of simply trying to crank something out on an arbitrary deadline.
Side by side comparison of the old and new design for #Sonic. Amazing congrats to the VFX team for working so hard to pull this off for #SonicMovie
How often do you see a studio owning up to a mistake and reworking a whole movie? Props are deserved here. I’ll support that. pic.twitter.com/ZrOBTUbemP
— Joshua Ovenshire (@TheJovenshire) November 12, 2019
That’s actually a really valuable lesson, especially considering the disastrous response another well-known brand is facing for releasing a subpar product. That fail belongs to the new iPad version of Photoshop, which has been widely panned by customers for lacking common features.
There’s honestly a little irony about a film where the main character’s slogan is “gotta go fast!” having to slow down to get it right. But that irony is nothing compared to the consequences of moving forward fast in the wrong direction.
It’s tempting, especially when you’ve invested as much time and effort and resources into something, to step back, admit that you might be wrong, and take the steps to get it right. As an entrepreneur, there are literally dozens, if not hundreds of decisions every day, each of which is an opportunity to either get it right or completely mess up your brand.
By the way, it’s inevitable that sometimes you’ll mess up. When you do, resist the temptation to ignore your critics just because they happen to be criticizing you. Sometimes those critics are screaming loudly in your direction because they are just as passionate about what you’re doing as you are. Sometimes they care about it because it’s something they’ve grown up with and they’re trusting you to get it right.
Thank you for the support. And the criticism. The message is loud and clear… you aren’t happy with the design & you want changes. It’s going to happen. Everyone at Paramount & Sega are fully committed to making this character the BEST he can be… #sonicmovie #gottafixfast
— Jeff Fowler (@fowltown) May 2, 2019
When that’s the case, do what Fowler and Paramount did and slow down. In fact, Fowler’s response is a great lesson in how to handle not living up to the expectations of your most loyal fans. Figure out where you went wrong, and then do what you have to do to get it right, even if that means redrawing your lead character.
In fact, while the original film had a budget of $90 million, CNBC estimated that it was likely “very costly” to redesign Sonic. But that cost was nothing compared to what you lose if you betray your most loyal fans.
The opinions expressed here by Inc.com columnists are their own, not those of Inc.com.
This article is from Inc.com