GENEVA – An independent panel said Monday that Chinese officials could have applied public health measures more forcefully in January to curb the initial COVID-19 outbreak, and criticized the World Health Organization (WHO) for not declaring an international emergency until Jan. 30.

The experts reviewing the global handling of the pandemic, led by former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, called for reforms to the Geneva-based United Nations agency.

Their interim report was published hours after the WHO’s top emergency expert, Mike Ryan, said that global deaths from COVID-19 were expected to top 100,000 per week “very soon.”

“What is clear to the Panel is that public health measures could have been applied more forcefully by local and national health authorities in China in January,” the report said, referring to the initial outbreak of the new disease in the central city of Wuhan, in Hubei province.

As evidence emerged of human-to-human transmission, “in far too many countries, this signal was ignored,” it added.

Specifically, it questioned why the WHO’s Emergency Committee did not meet until the third week of January and did not declare an international emergency until its second meeting on Jan. 30.

“Although the term pandemic is neither used nor defined in the International Health Regulations (2005), its use does serve to focus attention on the gravity of a health event. It was not until 11 March that WHO used the term,” the report said.

“The global pandemic alert system is not fit for purpose,” it said. “The World Health Organization has been underpowered to do the job.”

Under President Donald Trump, the United States has accused the WHO of being “China-centric,” which the agency denies. European countries led by France and Germany have pushed for addressing the WHO’s shortcomings on funding, governance and legal powers.

The panel called for a “global reset” and said that it would make recommendations in a final report to health ministers from the WHO’s 194 member states in May.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

You May Also Like

Stimulus Package: What’s in Joe Biden’s ‘American Rescue Plan’?

Democrats in Congress are racing to meet a mid-March deadline for President…

Judge rejects federal hate crimes plea deal for at least one of Ahmaud Arbery’s killers

A federal judge on Monday rejected a deal between federal prosecutors and…

For-Profit Schools to Face Penalties for High Debt Loads, Low Incomes of Graduates

Share Listen (2 min) This post first appeared on wsj.com

Britney Spears Files to Remove Her Father From Conservatorship

More than 13 years after the life and finances of Britney Spears…

GENEVA – An independent panel said Monday that Chinese officials could have applied public health measures more forcefully in January to curb the initial COVID-19 outbreak, and criticized the World Health Organization (WHO) for not declaring an international emergency until Jan. 30.

The experts reviewing the global handling of the pandemic, led by former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark and former Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, called for reforms to the Geneva-based United Nations agency.

Their interim report was published hours after the WHO’s top emergency expert, Mike Ryan, said that global deaths from COVID-19 were expected to top 100,000 per week “very soon.”

“What is clear to the Panel is that public health measures could have been applied more forcefully by local and national health authorities in China in January,” the report said, referring to the initial outbreak of the new disease in the central city of Wuhan, in Hubei province.

As evidence emerged of human-to-human transmission, “in far too many countries, this signal was ignored,” it added.

Specifically, it questioned why the WHO’s Emergency Committee did not meet until the third week of January and did not declare an international emergency until its second meeting on Jan. 30.

“Although the term pandemic is neither used nor defined in the International Health Regulations (2005), its use does serve to focus attention on the gravity of a health event. It was not until 11 March that WHO used the term,” the report said.

“The global pandemic alert system is not fit for purpose,” it said. “The World Health Organization has been underpowered to do the job.”

Under President Donald Trump, the United States has accused the WHO of being “China-centric,” which the agency denies. European countries led by France and Germany have pushed for addressing the WHO’s shortcomings on funding, governance and legal powers.

The panel called for a “global reset” and said that it would make recommendations in a final report to health ministers from the WHO’s 194 member states in May.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

You May Also Like

Boeing Gets Broadside From One of Its Biggest Customers

LONDON—The chief executive of Ryanair Holdings PLC, one of Boeing biggest customers,…

FAA investigating another jetpack sighting over Los Angeles

The Federal Aviation Administration is again investigating reports of a person in…

Disney Ensnared in Anaheim Corruption Probe

The Walt Disney Co. has become entangled in a corruption scandal unfolding…

Democrat Adam Schiff and Republican Steve Garvey advance to the general election in California’s Senate race

Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff and Republican Steve Garvey will advance to the…