WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats are divided on who should get the next round of stimulus payments, setting up a dispute as they try to approve $1,400 checks in the next Covid-19 relief package.

The most recent round of stimulus checks were cut off for people making more than $99,000 a year, or couples that made above $198,000. President Joe Biden recommended the same threshold in his $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief package.

But some Democrats want to see that income cap lowered.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., wants to “ensure upper-income taxpayers are not eligible” for the checks, according to a nonbinding amendment he and several other Democrats plan to push during votes on budget documents.

But Manchin’s text doesn’t define “upper income” — a term that has been used by lawmakers to describe a wide range of wealth.

Feb. 4, 202102:32

And even the co-sponsors of Manchin’s amendment disagree on what the threshold should be.

Manchin wants no checks for individuals making more than $75,000 per year, or couples making $150,000, his office said. He wants the amount to start phasing down at $50,000 per person, or $100,000 per couple.

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who backs Manchin’s amendment, said he doesn’t have a “detailed threshold in mind” but that he believes it should be “refined.”

“I do think it needs to be reduced from what the president has proposed,” King said.

The Manchin amendment passed by a vote of 99-1 as part of the “vote-a-rama” on Thursday, as part of the budget vehicle Democrats are using to pass a bill without requiring GOP support. But that was not an indicator of agreement — after all, senators define “upper-income” differently.

Apart from Manchin and King, the Democratic co-sponsors were Jon Tester of Montana, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly of Arizona, Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, John Hickenlooper of Colorado, and Mark Warner of Virginia.

The amendment comes after Biden told Democrats in a Wednesday call that he won’t compromise on the $1,400 amount for payments, because he’s “not going to start my administration by breaking a promise to the American people.” But he opened the door to adjusting the income levels.

“Maybe we can — I think we can better target that number. I’m OK with that,” he told Democrats, according to a source on the call.

Asked how he defines upper-income, Tester said: “I guess that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it depends on who you want to talk to. But I think the point of the amendment is, it’s negotiable so we can try to get some folks on board.”

“Joe called me up on it, I said, ‘Joe, sounds reasonable.’ That’s the reason Joe gave me. And I agree,” Tester said.

But some top Democrats don’t want to lower the eligibility level for checks.

Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who will be a key figure in crafting the reconciliation legislation, told NBC News he’s “not for changing the threshold” because that would exclude many Americans who are expecting relief.

“The people who got two checks already are expecting a third on the basis of the pledges and what was said through the campaign,” he said Thursday. “They have bills piling up, and they have difficulty paying their car insurance.”

Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who is shepherding the reconciliation process, said he will “insist” on a threshold of $75,000 per person and $150,000 per couple before it begins to phase down — the same eligibility as the last direct payment.

He said Democrats agree that Americans making more than that shouldn’t get payments.

“I don’t think there’s much argument — we don’t want to see people making $300,000 to $400,000 benefit from this,” he said.

Among the Democrats opposed a lower cutoff is Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia, who won a competitive Jan. 6 runoff after campaigning heavily on the stimulus checks.

“I’m advocating that we go big, and that we deliver as much direct relief to the people as we can,” Ossoff said Thursday.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

You May Also Like

Ohio State, Marc Jacobs come to truce over trademark of ‘THE’

Ohio State University—pardon, The Ohio State University— said Friday it had reached…

Would Life Be Better if You Worked Less?

Listen to article (2 minutes) Stephen E. Griffith was working up to…

The best umbrellas to use in 2021

Growing up in Florida, it was pretty common for me to get…

Ghislaine Maxwell’s family appeals to United Nations for help getting her out on bail

Ghislaine Maxwell’s siblings on Monday filed a complaint to the United Nations,…

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats are divided on who should get the next round of stimulus payments, setting up a dispute as they try to approve $1,400 checks in the next Covid-19 relief package.

The most recent round of stimulus checks were cut off for people making more than $99,000 a year, or couples that made above $198,000. President Joe Biden recommended the same threshold in his $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief package.

But some Democrats want to see that income cap lowered.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., wants to “ensure upper-income taxpayers are not eligible” for the checks, according to a nonbinding amendment he and several other Democrats plan to push during votes on budget documents.

But Manchin’s text doesn’t define “upper income” — a term that has been used by lawmakers to describe a wide range of wealth.

Feb. 4, 202102:32

And even the co-sponsors of Manchin’s amendment disagree on what the threshold should be.

Manchin wants no checks for individuals making more than $75,000 per year, or couples making $150,000, his office said. He wants the amount to start phasing down at $50,000 per person, or $100,000 per couple.

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who backs Manchin’s amendment, said he doesn’t have a “detailed threshold in mind” but that he believes it should be “refined.”

“I do think it needs to be reduced from what the president has proposed,” King said.

The Manchin amendment passed by a vote of 99-1 as part of the “vote-a-rama” on Thursday, as part of the budget vehicle Democrats are using to pass a bill without requiring GOP support. But that was not an indicator of agreement — after all, senators define “upper-income” differently.

Apart from Manchin and King, the Democratic co-sponsors were Jon Tester of Montana, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly of Arizona, Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, John Hickenlooper of Colorado, and Mark Warner of Virginia.

The amendment comes after Biden told Democrats in a Wednesday call that he won’t compromise on the $1,400 amount for payments, because he’s “not going to start my administration by breaking a promise to the American people.” But he opened the door to adjusting the income levels.

“Maybe we can — I think we can better target that number. I’m OK with that,” he told Democrats, according to a source on the call.

Asked how he defines upper-income, Tester said: “I guess that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it depends on who you want to talk to. But I think the point of the amendment is, it’s negotiable so we can try to get some folks on board.”

“Joe called me up on it, I said, ‘Joe, sounds reasonable.’ That’s the reason Joe gave me. And I agree,” Tester said.

But some top Democrats don’t want to lower the eligibility level for checks.

Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who will be a key figure in crafting the reconciliation legislation, told NBC News he’s “not for changing the threshold” because that would exclude many Americans who are expecting relief.

“The people who got two checks already are expecting a third on the basis of the pledges and what was said through the campaign,” he said Thursday. “They have bills piling up, and they have difficulty paying their car insurance.”

Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who is shepherding the reconciliation process, said he will “insist” on a threshold of $75,000 per person and $150,000 per couple before it begins to phase down — the same eligibility as the last direct payment.

He said Democrats agree that Americans making more than that shouldn’t get payments.

“I don’t think there’s much argument — we don’t want to see people making $300,000 to $400,000 benefit from this,” he said.

Among the Democrats opposed a lower cutoff is Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia, who won a competitive Jan. 6 runoff after campaigning heavily on the stimulus checks.

“I’m advocating that we go big, and that we deliver as much direct relief to the people as we can,” Ossoff said Thursday.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

You May Also Like

Inside the making of Biden’s omicron playbook

WASHINGTON — Last year on Christmas Eve, advisers to then-President-elect Joe Biden…

These 9 candidates have joined the House speaker race after Jim Jordan dropped out

House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik on Sunday announced in a post…

DA won’t seek new death sentence against Scott Peterson

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A California district attorney said in a court filing…

U.S. envoy touted peace in Afghanistan. 18 months later, peace is nowhere to be found

A year and a half since U.S. special envoy Zalmay Khalilzad brokered…

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats are divided on who should get the next round of stimulus payments, setting up a dispute as they try to approve $1,400 checks in the next Covid-19 relief package.

The most recent round of stimulus checks were cut off for people making more than $99,000 a year, or couples that made above $198,000. President Joe Biden recommended the same threshold in his $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief package.

But some Democrats want to see that income cap lowered.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., wants to “ensure upper-income taxpayers are not eligible” for the checks, according to a nonbinding amendment he and several other Democrats plan to push during votes on budget documents.

But Manchin’s text doesn’t define “upper income” — a term that has been used by lawmakers to describe a wide range of wealth.

Feb. 4, 202102:32

And even the co-sponsors of Manchin’s amendment disagree on what the threshold should be.

Manchin wants no checks for individuals making more than $75,000 per year, or couples making $150,000, his office said. He wants the amount to start phasing down at $50,000 per person, or $100,000 per couple.

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who backs Manchin’s amendment, said he doesn’t have a “detailed threshold in mind” but that he believes it should be “refined.”

“I do think it needs to be reduced from what the president has proposed,” King said.

The Manchin amendment passed by a vote of 99-1 as part of the “vote-a-rama” on Thursday, as part of the budget vehicle Democrats are using to pass a bill without requiring GOP support. But that was not an indicator of agreement — after all, senators define “upper-income” differently.

Apart from Manchin and King, the Democratic co-sponsors were Jon Tester of Montana, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly of Arizona, Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, John Hickenlooper of Colorado, and Mark Warner of Virginia.

The amendment comes after Biden told Democrats in a Wednesday call that he won’t compromise on the $1,400 amount for payments, because he’s “not going to start my administration by breaking a promise to the American people.” But he opened the door to adjusting the income levels.

“Maybe we can — I think we can better target that number. I’m OK with that,” he told Democrats, according to a source on the call.

Asked how he defines upper-income, Tester said: “I guess that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it depends on who you want to talk to. But I think the point of the amendment is, it’s negotiable so we can try to get some folks on board.”

“Joe called me up on it, I said, ‘Joe, sounds reasonable.’ That’s the reason Joe gave me. And I agree,” Tester said.

But some top Democrats don’t want to lower the eligibility level for checks.

Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who will be a key figure in crafting the reconciliation legislation, told NBC News he’s “not for changing the threshold” because that would exclude many Americans who are expecting relief.

“The people who got two checks already are expecting a third on the basis of the pledges and what was said through the campaign,” he said Thursday. “They have bills piling up, and they have difficulty paying their car insurance.”

Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who is shepherding the reconciliation process, said he will “insist” on a threshold of $75,000 per person and $150,000 per couple before it begins to phase down — the same eligibility as the last direct payment.

He said Democrats agree that Americans making more than that shouldn’t get payments.

“I don’t think there’s much argument — we don’t want to see people making $300,000 to $400,000 benefit from this,” he said.

Among the Democrats opposed a lower cutoff is Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia, who won a competitive Jan. 6 runoff after campaigning heavily on the stimulus checks.

“I’m advocating that we go big, and that we deliver as much direct relief to the people as we can,” Ossoff said Thursday.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

You May Also Like

Chuck Todd: When words lose meaning in politics

One of the hallmark answers of the confident Democratic strategist about 2024…

Experimental drug for marijuana addiction shows promise, small study finds

As marijuana use in the United States reaches record highs among young…

Newly freed hostages describe what life was like while being held by Hamas

TEL AVIV — As hostages released by Hamas this weekend try to…

Winter Layoffs Show Early Signs of Easing

Unemployment claims are approaching a month of declines as the labor market…

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats are divided on who should get the next round of stimulus payments, setting up a dispute as they try to approve $1,400 checks in the next Covid-19 relief package.

The most recent round of stimulus checks were cut off for people making more than $99,000 a year, or couples that made above $198,000. President Joe Biden recommended the same threshold in his $1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief package.

But some Democrats want to see that income cap lowered.

Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., wants to “ensure upper-income taxpayers are not eligible” for the checks, according to a nonbinding amendment he and several other Democrats plan to push during votes on budget documents.

But Manchin’s text doesn’t define “upper income” — a term that has been used by lawmakers to describe a wide range of wealth.

Feb. 4, 202102:32

And even the co-sponsors of Manchin’s amendment disagree on what the threshold should be.

Manchin wants no checks for individuals making more than $75,000 per year, or couples making $150,000, his office said. He wants the amount to start phasing down at $50,000 per person, or $100,000 per couple.

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, who backs Manchin’s amendment, said he doesn’t have a “detailed threshold in mind” but that he believes it should be “refined.”

“I do think it needs to be reduced from what the president has proposed,” King said.

The Manchin amendment passed by a vote of 99-1 as part of the “vote-a-rama” on Thursday, as part of the budget vehicle Democrats are using to pass a bill without requiring GOP support. But that was not an indicator of agreement — after all, senators define “upper-income” differently.

Apart from Manchin and King, the Democratic co-sponsors were Jon Tester of Montana, Kyrsten Sinema and Mark Kelly of Arizona, Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, John Hickenlooper of Colorado, and Mark Warner of Virginia.

The amendment comes after Biden told Democrats in a Wednesday call that he won’t compromise on the $1,400 amount for payments, because he’s “not going to start my administration by breaking a promise to the American people.” But he opened the door to adjusting the income levels.

“Maybe we can — I think we can better target that number. I’m OK with that,” he told Democrats, according to a source on the call.

Asked how he defines upper-income, Tester said: “I guess that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, it depends on who you want to talk to. But I think the point of the amendment is, it’s negotiable so we can try to get some folks on board.”

“Joe called me up on it, I said, ‘Joe, sounds reasonable.’ That’s the reason Joe gave me. And I agree,” Tester said.

But some top Democrats don’t want to lower the eligibility level for checks.

Senate Finance Chairman Ron Wyden, D-Ore., who will be a key figure in crafting the reconciliation legislation, told NBC News he’s “not for changing the threshold” because that would exclude many Americans who are expecting relief.

“The people who got two checks already are expecting a third on the basis of the pledges and what was said through the campaign,” he said Thursday. “They have bills piling up, and they have difficulty paying their car insurance.”

Senate Budget Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who is shepherding the reconciliation process, said he will “insist” on a threshold of $75,000 per person and $150,000 per couple before it begins to phase down — the same eligibility as the last direct payment.

He said Democrats agree that Americans making more than that shouldn’t get payments.

“I don’t think there’s much argument — we don’t want to see people making $300,000 to $400,000 benefit from this,” he said.

Among the Democrats opposed a lower cutoff is Sen. Jon Ossoff of Georgia, who won a competitive Jan. 6 runoff after campaigning heavily on the stimulus checks.

“I’m advocating that we go big, and that we deliver as much direct relief to the people as we can,” Ossoff said Thursday.

Source: | This article originally belongs to Nbcnews.com

You May Also Like

U.S. Push for Carbon-Neutral Ships Expected to Reveal Industry Divisions

A new U.S. push to cut ship emissions will kick into high…

American Express Revenue Up 31% as Spending Remains Robust

American Express said spending among its cardholders continued to strengthen in the…

New Jersey woman gets year in prison for role in $400K GoFundMe scam with fake story about homeless man 

CAMDEN, N.J. — A woman who admitted her role in a scam…

Shanghai Has Reopened, but Not Disneyland

HONG KONG—Shanghai is emerging from a monthslong Covid-induced lockdown, but for many…