The government needs an environmental sense of purpose that specifies the appropriate ends for economic activity

Saving the planet ought to be a goal for, not a cost to, humanity. Yet this insight appears lost in the discussion about the climate emergency. Last week, it emerged that the Treasury was thinking about levying a UK-wide carbon tax. This approach, it was suggested, could be sold as a way of “raising revenue while cutting emissions”. Properly targeted taxes can change behaviour. But “revenue raising” green policies invariably end up being valued by the amount of taxes they produce rather than on their effectiveness in combating the climate crisis. UK governments have frozen fuel duties for a decade because it is politically easier to rake in cash than deter driving.

A carbon tax is superficially appealing. The Treasury desires taxes to offset government spending. No 10 would like to align, rhetorically, with the green agenda. But without careful thought a carbon levy could backfire. A maladroit attempt to tax fuel on environmental grounds kindled France’s gilets jaunes (yellow vests) protests.

Continue reading…

You May Also Like

Squid Game: The Challenge contestants threaten legal action against Netflix and producers

Reality gameshow participants got ‘hypothermia’ and ‘injuries’ when filming in Bedfordshire, two…

Hurricane Franklin path

hurricane franklin

Artists call on Manchester venue to reinstate event celebrating Palestinian voices

More than 300 artists and cultural workers write open letter to Home…

The nature of the sphinx moth: ‘it uses its big-ass tongue to get this guy pollinated’ | Helen Sullivan

Some species feed on nectar or honey. Others drink the tears of…